The decision that a runner may make with what running shoes to use could be extremely important. Having the athletic shoes correct has implications for how quick the athlete runs and could impact the possibility for a running injury. There are, however, people who do disagree with that and there is certainly plenty of discussion in regards to the concerns. There exists some facts to support each sides of this controversy on running shoes, but not much general opinion and it depends upon the method that you choose to spin the evidence regarding which side of the controversy that you want to believe in. The podiatry relevant live talk on Facebook, PodChatLive not too long ago reviewed this topic by talking to Dr Chris Napier, Physiotherapist and Associate Professor from the University of British Columbia (and 2:33 marathoner). PodChatLive is a weekly chat that goes out live on Facebook and then transferred to YouTube at the end of the live broadcast.
During this episode on running shoes, Chris outlined his latest British Journal of Sports Medicine article which was relating to the logical myths in the athletic shoes argument. The hosts and Chris brought up how runners (both uninjured as well as injured) should select athletic shoes. They talked about exactly what the science does actually informs us along with what it doesn’t yet tell us. Additionally, they talked about just how much focus and attention athletic shoes appears to get and asked, is it just simply all about comfort? Chris Napier is a Clinical Assistant Professor within the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of British Columbia as well as an associate member of the Centre for Hip Health and Mobility. Chris Napier initially obtained his Master of Physiotherapy education in Perth in Australia, in 2003, and then his PhD at the UBC in 2018 about running biomechanics and injury. Since becoming a physical therapist, Chris has specialised his education with postgraduate research in manual therapy as well as sport physical therapy.